Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:49

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Good news, bad news for NASCAR Cup teams ahead of Mexico City weekend - NBC Sports
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
WA whooping cough cases soar as vaccination rates drop - The Seattle Times
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why is digital marketing important?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why did you put a guy’s dick in your mouth the first time?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Do all armies have the same rank structure?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Is it safe to take a hot shower after being exposed to extremely low temperatures?